> Or even simpler problems, like : how were you to handle the angry Richard > recently? Your response, and I quote: "Aaargh!" (as in "how on earth do I > calculate my probabilities and Bayes?" and "which school of psychological > thought is relevant here?") Now you're talking AGI. There is no rational or > logical or mathematical way to handle another person, nor to make a > scientific discovery nor to do anything that is AGI as opposed to narrow AI. > I urgently advise reading Kauffman's Reinventing the Sacred, where he says > compatible things (& may do a more extensive post on the book). >
I think I understand your feeling on this and where it comes from, but, I respectfully disagree ;-) You can't feel what your unconscious is doing so your subjective report is of no value for telling whether it is following approximatively-rational processes or not ... Anyway there is no way to convince you I'm right via argumentation, so it's not really worthwhile to spend more effort trying... You'll be convinced in time, for instance if an OpenCogPrime instance starts refuting your arguments on this mailing list! ben ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=108809214-a0d121 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
