Good point, this applies to me as well (I'll let YKY answer as it applies to him). I should have said "conditional independence" rather than just "independence".
--Abram On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 4:21 PM, Kingma, D.P. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 9:00 PM, YKY (Yan King Yin) > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> --a. Makes unwarranted independence assumptions >> >> Yes, I think independence should always be assumed "unless otherwise >> stated" -- which means there exists a Bayesian network link between X >> and Y. > > Small question... aren't Bbayesian network nodes just _conditionally_ > independent: so that set A is only independent from set B when > d-separated by some set Z? So please clarify, if possible, what kind > of independence you assume in your model. > > Kind regards, > Durk Kingma > The Netherlands > > > ------------------------------------------- > agi > Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now > RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ > Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?&; > Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com > ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69 Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
