>
>
> I mean that a more productive approach would be to try to understand why
> the problem is so hard.



IMO Richard Loosemore is half-right ... the reason AGI is so hard has to do
with Santa Fe Institute style
complexity ...

Intelligence is not fundamentally grounded in any particular mechanism but
rather in emergent structures
and dynamics that arise in certain complex systems coupled with their
environments ...

Characterizing what these emergent structures/dynamics are is hard, and then
figuring out how to make these
structures/dynamics emerge from computationally feasible knowledge
representation and creation structures/
dynamics is hard ...

It's hard for much the reason that systems biology is hard: it rubs against
the grain of the reductionist
approach to science that has become prevalent ... and there's insufficient
data to do it fully rigorously so
you gotta cleverly and intuitively fill in some big gaps ... (until a few
decades from now, when better bio
data may provide a lot more info for cog sci, AGI and systems biology...

-- Ben



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to