--- On Thu, 10/2/08, Ben Goertzel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>I hope not to sound like a broken record here ... but ... not every
>narrow AI advance is actually a step toward AGI ...

It is if AGI is billions of narrow experts and a distributed index to get your 
messages to the right ones.

I understand your objection that it is way too expensive ($1 quadrillion), even 
if it does pay for itself. I would like to be proved wrong...

-- Matt Mahoney, [EMAIL PROTECTED]




-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to