Hi,

> CMR (my proposal) has no centralized control (global brain). It is a
> competitive market in which information has negative value. The environment
> is a peer-to-peer network where peers receive messages in natural language,
> cache a copy, and route them to appropriate experts based on content.
>

You seem to misunderstand the notion of a Global Brain, see

http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/GBRAIFAQ.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Global_brain

It does not require centralized control, but is in fact more focused on
emergent dynamical "control" mechanisms.


>
> I believe that CMR is initially friendly in the sense that a market is
> friendly.



Which is to say: dangerous, volatile, hard to predict ... and often not
friendly at all!!!


> A market is the most efficient way to satisfy the collective goals of its
> participants. It is fair, but not benevolent.


I believe this is an extremely oversimplistic and dangerous view of
economics ;-)

Traditional economic theory which argues that free markets are optimally
efficient, is based on a patently false assumption of infinitely rational
economic actors.    This assumption is **particularly** poor when the
economic actors are largely **humans**, who are highly nonrational.

As a single isolated example, note that in the US right now, many people are
withdrawing their $$ from banks even if they have less than $100K in their
accounts ... even though the government insures bank accounts up to $100K.
What are they doing?  Insuring themselves against a total collapse of the US
economic system?  If so they should be buying gold with their $$, but only a
few of them are doing that.  People are in large part emotional not rational
actors, and for this reason pure free-markets involving humans are far from
the most efficient way to satisfy the collective goals of a set of humans.

Anyway a deep discussion of economics would likely be too big of a
digression, though it may be pertinent insofar as it's a metaphor for the
internal dynamics of an AGI ... (for instance Eric Baum, who is a fairly
hardcore libertarian politically, is in favor of free markets as a model for
credit assignment in AI systems ... and OpenCog/NCE contains an "economic
attention allocation" component...)

ben g



-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=114414975-3c8e69
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to