Ok.

>"We think we're seeing short-term memories forming in the hippocampus and 
>slowly turning into
>long-term memories in the cortex," says Miller, who presented the results last 
>week at the Society
>for Neuroscience meeting in Washington DC.

It certainly sounds like the genetic changes are limited to the brain
itself. Perhaps there is some kind of extra DNA scratch space allotted
to cranial nerve cells. I understand that psilocybin, a phosphorylated
serotonin-like neurotransmitter found in fungal mycelia, may have
evolved as a phosphorous bank for all the DNA needed in spore
production. The structure of fungal mycelia closely approximates that
of the brains found in the animal kingdom, which may have evolved from
the same or some shared point. Then we see how the brain can be viewed
as a qualified, indeed purpose-built DNA recombination factory!

Fungal mycelia could be approaching all this from the opposite
direction, doing DNA computation incidentally so as to perform
short-term weather forecasts and other environmental calculations,
simply because there is so much of it about for the next sporulation.
A really compelling avenue for investigation

>"The cool idea here is that the brain could be borrowing a form of cellular 
>memory from
>developmental biology to use for what we think of as memory," says Marcelo 
>Wood, who
>researches long-term memory at the University of California, Irvine.

Yes. It is

Eric B

On 12/11/08, Eric Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
> I don't know how you derived the value 10^4, Matt, but that seems
> reasonable to me. Terren, let me go back to the article and try to
> understand what exactly it says is happening. Certainly that's my
> editorial's crux
>
> On 12/11/08, Matt Mahoney <[email protected]> wrote:
>> --- On Thu, 12/11/08, Eric Burton <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> I don't think that each inheritor receives a full set of the
>>> original's memories. But there may have *evolved* in spite of the
>>> obvious barriers, a means of transferring primary or significant
>>> experience from one organism to another in genetic form...
>>> we can imagine such a thing given this news!
>>
>> Well, we could, if there was any evidence whatsoever for Lamarckian
>> evolution, and if we thought with our reproductive organs.
>>
>> To me, it suggests that AGI could be implemented with a 10^4 speedup over
>> whole brain emulation -- maybe. Is it possible to emulate a sparse neural
>> network with 10^11 adjustable neurons and 10^15 fixed, random connections
>> using a non-sparse neural network with 10^11 adjustable connections?
>>
>> -- Matt Mahoney, [email protected]
>>
>>
>>
>> -------------------------------------------
>> agi
>> Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
>> RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
>> Modify Your Subscription:
>> https://www.listbox.com/member/?&;
>> Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
>>
>


-------------------------------------------
agi
Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now
RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/
Modify Your Subscription: 
https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b
Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com

Reply via email to