On Jan 1, 2009, at 2:35 PM, J. Andrew Rogers wrote:
Since "digital" and "analog" are the same thing computationally ("digital" is a subset of "analog"), and non-digital computers have been generally superior for several decades, this is not relevant.
Gah, that should be *digital* computers have generally been superior for several decades (the last non-digital hold-outs I am aware of were designed in the late 1970s).
J. Andrew Rogers ------------------------------------------- agi Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/303/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/303/ Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=8660244&id_secret=123753653-47f84b Powered by Listbox: http://www.listbox.com
