First let me say that whilst I have only recently started using agilo,  
I am very impressed.

I am however having similar problems with the burndown chart. As shown  
here http://img29.imageshack.us/img29/9389/burndown.png. I can only  
assume they are to do with timezone issues (I tried having a look at  
the code but rapidly got lost in all the conversions to and from utc).  
I am in New Zealand, and have the timezone on the server and within  
trac set to Pacific/Auckland. There are several things about the  
attached burndown that don't make sense to me.

1) Whilst the weekends are shaded in the correct places, the capacity  
and ideal burndown lines seem to be offset by a day (I assume the flat  
part should be over the weekend).
2) The actual burndown does not seem correct to me. Since starting  
this sprint I have completed two tasks. The first was at 6:45pm on the  
10, and reduced the remaining time by 12h. The second was at 3:45pm on  
the 11th and reduced the remaining time by 6h. The way I understand  
that it should work is that the dot at the beginning of the 11th  
should be at 54h (instead of the 66 it is at) as the work had been  
done by then, and that the dot part way through the 11th should be at  
48h (instead of the 54 it is at), as the work has been done between  
the start of the day and now.

Are my assumptions correct in the way this should work, and if so is  
this incorrect behaviour likely down to a setup issue on my end, or a  
bug in the system?

Thanks.

Chris Manning
Integrated POS Solutions
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Agilo for Scrum" group. This group is moderated by agile42 GmbH 
http://www.agile42.com and is focused in supporting Agilo for Scrum users.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/agilo?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to