> I've been following the recent discussion about the slowness of Agilo > for some users, because we also experience a relatively slow connection. > > For example, if I access any of the bug reports in the left menu bar, > it takes several seconds to download fully. However, the bottom of the > report indicates: > > Agilo 0.7.4.1-r1624-20090611 © 2008 agile42 all rights reserved (this > page was served in: 0.264395 sec.)
This is quite an old version of Agilo, which probably means that you also use an older version of Trac. If possible updating both of these should result in significant performance gains. (Especially if trac is older than 0.11.3 > which is clearly much much faster. > > Why would there be such a discrepency between the reported speed and > the actual speed? I believe that this shows the time it took to render that individual page. However if mod-python is also responsible for delivering all the static content on the page, that is not taken into account there - but still slows down the load-speed significantly. If that is the case, you could try to offload responsibility for static files to appache itself and gain a significant speed boost. This should get you started: http://groups.google.com/group/agilo/msg/860eac565cb0a98d HTH, Martin --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ Follow Agilo on Twitter: http://twitter.com/agiloforscrum ----- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Agilo for Scrum" group. This group is moderated by agile42 GmbH http://www.agile42.com and is focused in supporting Agilo for Scrum users. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/agilo?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
