On Wed, 2009-05-20 at 12:54 +0100, Alex Smith wrote: > On Tue, 2009-05-19 at 19:01 -0400, Warrigal wrote (in spoon-business): > > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 5:22 PM, Roger Hicks <pidge...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > CONTRACTS > > > --------- > > > (none) > > > > I agree to all documents as public contracts. > > I call for judgement on the statement "Warrigal would be party to all > Agoran public contracts that allow em to join by announcement, if the > fact were announced in an Agoran public forum." > > Arguments: > It's been previously established that you can agree to a contract in a > discussion forum. Agoran public contracts are, I believe, documents by > both Agora's definition and B's. So does agreeing to a contract in a > different nomic's PF also bind one to it in Agora?
Further arguments: B's contract rules are currently exactly the same as Agora's (with all instances of "Agora" replaced with "B", if there are any). -- ais523
