I CFJ on the following statement: {{{In an AI 4 proposal, "Change
gamestate value X from 'Y' to 'Z'" has the same meaning as "If gamestate
value X is currently 'Y', change it to 'Z'".}}}Arguments: We've been playing as if this were true. However, an AI 4 proposal is powerful enough to create a legal fiction that the old value of gamestate value X was in fact Y, and this seems to be the literal meaning of what was written. Where does the convention that changes fail if the old value was specified incorrectly come from? -- ais523
