On Sat, Feb 20, 2010 at 11:15 AM, ais523 <[email protected]> wrote: > I CFJ on the following statement: {{{In an AI 4 proposal, "Change > gamestate value X from 'Y' to 'Z'" has the same meaning as "If gamestate > value X is currently 'Y', change it to 'Z'".}}} > > Arguments: We've been playing as if this were true. However, an AI 4 > proposal is powerful enough to create a legal fiction that the old value > of gamestate value X was in fact Y, and this seems to be the literal > meaning of what was written. Where does the convention that changes fail > if the old value was specified incorrectly come from? > > -- > ais523
I disfavor this case.
