I vote as follows:

8008*  CB [1]       1.0  Picto-Nomic                 CB [1]      3 sh.
AGAINST, it's a silly idea and could lead to some very confusing situations where nobody knows how the rule is to be interpreted
8009*  Trigon, [2]  2.6  PAoaM v6 [3]                Trigon      3 sh.
FOR, nobody has found a major flaw yet, and we need to get the economy ball rolling again.

Reply via email to