I present the following procedural argument to the court: Your most humble and gracious honour: the ridiculous requirements on us 411 regarding the f0rm of our arguments are piling up, detracting from the quality of our arguments. I therefore ask the court to rule that no further such requirements shall be imposed until at least 10 non-procedural arguments are made.
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 12:44 AM, Publius Scribonius Scholasticus < p.scribonius.scholasti...@gmail.com> wrote: > I present the following procedural argument to the court: > > Your Honor, My Fellow Counselors V.J. Rada and Aris seem to have no > respect for the Great and Ancient Nomics. I ask the court that all > Counselors SHALL refer to FRC and Agora as the Great and Ancient Nomic > of the FRC and the Great and Ancient Nomic of Agora, respectively, in > order to show respect not just to persons, but also for the Great and > Ancient Nomics. Additionally, your honor, I ask the court that @11 > Counselors SHALL NOT use "wildly non-standard 5pe11ink" when > addressing individuals, Great and Ancient Nomics, or the court, as > doing so lessens the respect shown to the addressed person or entity. > -- >From V.J. Rada
