I do the same. Gaelan
> On Oct 31, 2018, at 7:50 AM, Kerim Aydin <ke...@u.washington.edu> wrote: > > > > > On Sun, 28 Oct 2018, Kerim Aydin wrote: >>> 8118 G. 2.0 Laurels Last Longer >> FOR > > I change my vote on 8118 to AGAINST. It is buggy - if the Speaker > becomes vacant without a win happening, there would be no laureled > players to appoint. > > >>> 8122 Murphy 3.0 Middle of the road >> PRESENT. I really want to think on this one. Departing from a 1 vote >> baseline is a big step. > > I change my vote on 8122 to FOR. I think this is a good idea - > it makes blot punishments have meaningful steps downward (as it is > now, if you have 3 blots, you don't have a reason to care if you > get more). > > >
