I support. I want to agree with Aris, and I am definitely open to being convinced. But in ordinary language, intent is a mental state. The two relevant paragraphs require that “the” (singular) intent be announced in a particular manner. It seems correct to say that the intent is singular, based on the word “the,” but there is nothing in the rules that I can discern that would require “the” intent to be announced once and only once.
> On 2/7/2019 5:39 PM, Kerim Aydin wrote: > > I think that the judgement should address the issue specifically given that > it has come up and is of interest (even if ending up at the same place). I intend to file a motion to reconsider the below 2 CFJs w/2 Support. > > > >
