> On Feb 9, 2019, at 8:30 AM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote: > > > I award myself an Indigo Ribbon. > I CFJ: "I own an Indigo Ribbon."
This is CFJ 3705. > On Feb 9, 2019, at 1:36 PM, Cuddle Beam <cuddleb...@gmail.com> wrote: > > I submit the following CFJ, and I suggest the same Judge to be assigned to > both (it's trivially False if Trigon's is False too, but if Trigon's is > True then we're in big business): > "All Players are parties to the Rules as a contract." > > Another CFJ which is trivially False if Trigon's is False, but anyways, I > call the following: > "The Ruleset (as a contract) now has 1 coin." These are CFJs 3706 and 3707. I assign 3705, 3706, and 3707 to G. For purposes of evenly allocating CFJs among judges, I plan to start informally counting “linked” CFJs as a single CFJ. Let me know if anyone has a problem with that. I would treat these three CFJs as linked.
