Good point! Based on his recent hashes, he probably is. Therefore:
If Aris’s message initiates any Agoran Decisions, then I vote, and I cause L,
ATMunn, and Gaelan to vote, for the first of {AGAINST, AFFIRM, Gaelan} which is
a valid option.
Gaelan, I hope you don’t mind my changing your vote for you, but at least I
changed it to you...
> On Feb 18, 2019, at 6:32 PM, Timon Walshe-Grey <m...@timon.red> wrote:
>
> Hold on, are we sure G. isn't in on it?
>
> -twg
>
>
> ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐‐‐‐‐
>> On Monday, February 18, 2019 11:31 PM, D. Margaux <dmargaux...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>> Like Gaelan, I do the following, and I cause ATMunn to do the following:
>>
>> - object to any intents announced in the quoted message.
>> - if quoted message initiates any Agoran Decisions, vote for the first of
>> {AGAINST, AFFIRM, G.} which is a valid option.
>> - if the quoted message contains an attempt to Ratify Without Objection an
>> incorrect document, point a thumb at Aris for the class-8 crime of Endorsing
>> Forgery.
>>
>> If the quoted message initiates any Agoran Decisions, I cause L to vote
>> for the first of {AGAINST, AFFIRM, G.} which is a valid option.
>>
>>
>>>> On Feb 17, 2019, at 10:31 PM, Aris Merchant
>>>> thoughtsoflifeandligh...@gmail.com wrote:
>>>> I give notice that I intend to activate The Protocol, according to the
>>>> timetable specified for activations thereof. (If anyone remembers what this
>>>> means, please contact me rather than trying to block it; we may be able to
>>>> work something out.)
>>>> -Aris
>
>
