[resending to fix formatting] On 6/25/20 6:24 PM, Kerim Aydin via agora-official wrote: > The below is CFJ 3858. I assign it to grok. > > CFJ Statement: > An action to be performed with 7 days notice depends on objections.
Gratuitous arguments for the judge (grok, again, I suppose): >From R. Lee (https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-June/059234.html): > This is silly for the following reasons. Actions like "With T notice" are > called, by the ruleset, DEPENDENT ACTIONS. What do these actions depend on? > They depend on a specific set of conditions being met, in this case 7 days > passing. What does it mean to depend on objections? To have, in the > conditions for the DEPENDENT ACTION to work, the absence of objections as a > condition. Response to R. Lee from Jason (https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-discussion/2020-June/059235.html): > On 6/23/20 10:15 PM, Ed Strange via agora-discussion wrote: > > This is silly for the following reasons. Actions like "With T notice" are > > called, by the ruleset, DEPENDENT ACTIONS. What do these actions depend on? > > They depend on a specific set of conditions being met, in this case 7 days > > passing. What does it mean to depend on objections? To have, in the > > conditions for the DEPENDENT ACTION to work, the absence of objections as a > > condition. > > > Counterpoint: even with T notice depends on the absence of objections > from a specific person - the Speaker, so it is still dependent on the > state of objections to the intent in general. > > -- > Jason Cobb -- Jason Cobb
