On Thu, Apr 01, 2021 at 01:21:50PM -0400, Jason Cobb via agora-business wrote: > On 4/1/21 1:18 PM, Reuben Staley via agora-business wrote: > > On 3/31/21 12:39 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote: > >> On Sun, Mar 28, 2021 at 11:14:44PM +0000, Reuben Staley via > >> agora-discussion wrote: > >>> On 3/21/21 2:26 AM, Falsifian via agora-business wrote: > >>>> On Mon, Mar 15, 2021 at 02:52:37PM -0600, Reuben Staley via > >>>> agora-business wrote: > >>>>> I intended to publish something like this a few months ago but life > >>>>> happened. My strict timing really did not help anything. > >>>>> > >>>>> I intend, with 2 Agoran consent, to apply the following amendment to the > >>>>> auction regulations: > >>>>> > >>>>> --- > >>>>> Amend AM0 by replacing the following text in the fourth bullet point > >>>>> under > >>>>> "4. AWARDING": > >>>>> within, four days after the ending of that auction, > >>>>> with: > >>>>> after the ending of that auction > >>>>> > >>>>> Then, by changing the following text under under CLAIMING: > >>>>> For a period of seven days after an auction ends > >>>>> with: > >>>>> During the period from the end of the auction until 7 days after > >>>>> the publication of the termination message > >>>>> --- > >>>>> > >>>>> -- > >>>>> Trigon > >>>>> (Does the > >>>> SHALL have any effect without a time limit?) > >>> I do not think any obligations have any meaning in the context of the > >>> auction regulations as written and I do not know if defining punishments > >>> within the regulations would do anything. > >> Oops, I forgot that, sorry. In that case, for what it's worth, I > >> withdraw my objection. > >> > > ǐ ïǹţəñð ťø ḑêčłåřẹ ạṗąẗȟÿ ŝṗéçịḟỳíŋĝ ṁỹśęłḟ > > > > I object, though I'm pretty sure that counts as being "obfuscated". > > -- > Jason Cobb > > Assessor, Rulekeepor, Stonemason
I also object. -- Falsifian
