COE: the reduce sparkle proposal was retracted. I made a new proposal named
it's a grey grey world that you missed. I linked that message 2 times in
discord.

On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 8:49 AM Aris via agora-official <
agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:

> PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW.
>
> I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
> and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
> collector
> is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and the
> valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> conditional votes).
>
> ID      Author(s)               AI    Title
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 8575*   R. Lee                  3.0   Nicer Definitions
>
>
> The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal(s):
>
> Author(s)               AI    Title
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Mask                    1.0   Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
> R. Lee                  3.0   Reduce Sparkle by 50%!
>
> Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
>         <ID>& : Ordinary proposal.
>         <ID>~ : Unsponsored proposal.
>
> The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
> the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
> the information shown above shall control.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> ID: 8575
> Title: Nicer Definitions
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: R. Lee
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Amend rule 2152, "Mother May I", by replacing
>
>   "SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the
>   described action, the full implications of performing it should
>    be understood and carefully weighed."
>
> with
>
>
>   ""SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the
>   described action, the full implications of performing it ought to be
>   be understood and carefully weighed."
>
>
> and also by replacing
>
>   "SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the
>    described action, the full implications of failing to perform
>    it should (in the ordinary-language sense) be understood and
>    carefully weighed."
>
> with
>
>   "SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the
>   described action, the full implications of failing to perform
>   it ought to be understood and
>   carefully weighed."
>
> [Explanation: The word SHOULD is currently defined as meaning the word
> should. This is not technically recursive because the upper case terms are
> terms of art, but it looks awful. This proposal means that it becomes
> "ought to", which just looks better. I also get to remove a terribly clunky
> parenthetical.]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Title: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
> Adoption index: 1.0
> Author: Mask
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> On successful repeal of a rule, the player who proposed the repeal gains
> 2 Pendants.
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> Title: Reduce Sparkle by 50%!
> Adoption index: 3.0
> Author: R. Lee
> Co-author(s):
>
>
> Amend rule 2438, "Ribbons' by removing the last paragraph (for clarity, I
> mean the list item beginning with "- Otherwise")
> [there's no reason for the part about glitter to be in the Ribbons rule.
> The power 1 glitter rule can grant coins and it can take the definition of
> what  ribbons are from the higher power rule]
>
> Amend rule 2602, "Glitter", so that it reads, in full
> {Each type of Ribbon has a corresponding type of Glitter with the same
> name. When a person qualifies for a Ribbon of a type they already have, any
> player CAN award them the corresponding type of Glitter by announcement.
> That notwithstanding, a person cannot receive glitter if e has already
> received it five times in the last 24 hours, or if e has not come to earn
> or qualify for that Glitter since the last time e received that type of
> Glitter. When a player receives a type of Glitter, the Tailor CAN and in an
> officially timely fashion SHALL once award them 5 boatloads of coins]
>
> //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
>

Reply via email to