Link to retraction of reduce sparkle andcreation of new proposal
https://mailman.agoranomic.org/cgi-bin/mailman/private/agora-business/202
This was sent to the right forum despite header.
On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 9:55 AM Rebecca Lee via agora-business <
agora-business@agoranomic.org> wrote:
> COE: the reduce sparkle proposal was retracted. I made a new proposal named
> it's a grey grey world that you missed. I linked that message 2 times in
> discord.
>
> On Mon, Jul 5, 2021, 8:49 AM Aris via agora-official <
> agora-offic...@agoranomic.org> wrote:
>
> > PROMOTOR'S REPORT AS OF RIGHT NOW.
> >
> > I hereby distribute each listed proposal, initiating a referendum on it,
> > and removing it from the proposal pool. For this decision, the vote
> > collector
> > is the Assessor, the quorum is 5, the voting method is AI-majority, and
> the
> > valid options are FOR and AGAINST (PRESENT is also a valid vote, as are
> > conditional votes).
> >
> > ID Author(s) AI Title
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > 8575* R. Lee 3.0 Nicer Definitions
> >
> >
> > The proposal pool currently contains the following proposal(s):
> >
> > Author(s) AI Title
> >
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Mask 1.0 Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
> > R. Lee 3.0 Reduce Sparkle by 50%!
> >
> > Legend: <ID>* : Democratic proposal.
> > <ID>& : Ordinary proposal.
> > <ID>~ : Unsponsored proposal.
> >
> > The full text of the aforementioned proposal(s) is included below. Where
> > the information shown below differs from the information shown above,
> > the information shown above shall control.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > ID: 8575
> > Title: Nicer Definitions
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: R. Lee
> > Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> > Amend rule 2152, "Mother May I", by replacing
> >
> > "SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the
> > described action, the full implications of performing it should
> > be understood and carefully weighed."
> >
> > with
> >
> >
> > ""SHOULD NOT, DISCOURAGED, DEPRECATED: Before performing the
> > described action, the full implications of performing it ought to be
> > be understood and carefully weighed."
> >
> >
> > and also by replacing
> >
> > "SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the
> > described action, the full implications of failing to perform
> > it should (in the ordinary-language sense) be understood and
> > carefully weighed."
> >
> > with
> >
> > "SHOULD, ENCOURAGED, RECOMMENDED: Before failing to perform the
> > described action, the full implications of failing to perform
> > it ought to be understood and
> > carefully weighed."
> >
> > [Explanation: The word SHOULD is currently defined as meaning the word
> > should. This is not technically recursive because the upper case terms
> are
> > terms of art, but it looks awful. This proposal means that it becomes
> > "ought to", which just looks better. I also get to remove a terribly
> clunky
> > parenthetical.]
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > Title: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle
> > Adoption index: 1.0
> > Author: Mask
> > Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> > On successful repeal of a rule, the player who proposed the repeal gains
> > 2 Pendants.
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> > Title: Reduce Sparkle by 50%!
> > Adoption index: 3.0
> > Author: R. Lee
> > Co-author(s):
> >
> >
> > Amend rule 2438, "Ribbons' by removing the last paragraph (for clarity, I
> > mean the list item beginning with "- Otherwise")
> > [there's no reason for the part about glitter to be in the Ribbons rule.
> > The power 1 glitter rule can grant coins and it can take the definition
> of
> > what ribbons are from the higher power rule]
> >
> > Amend rule 2602, "Glitter", so that it reads, in full
> > {Each type of Ribbon has a corresponding type of Glitter with the same
> > name. When a person qualifies for a Ribbon of a type they already have,
> any
> > player CAN award them the corresponding type of Glitter by announcement.
> > That notwithstanding, a person cannot receive glitter if e has already
> > received it five times in the last 24 hours, or if e has not come to earn
> > or qualify for that Glitter since the last time e received that type of
> > Glitter. When a player receives a type of Glitter, the Tailor CAN and in
> an
> > officially timely fashion SHALL once award them 5 boatloads of coins]
> >
> > //////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> >
>
