I vote as follows:
ID Author(s) AI Title --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8607* Telna, ais523, Alexis 3.0 Asset Self-Ratification Fix
FOR
8608* Telna, Jason, G., [1] 3.0 Powering Up
FOR
8609& Jason 1.0 Axiom of Limitations
FOR
8610& Jason 1.7 No Immediate Shenanigans
ENDORSE Jason
8611& Jason, Trigon 1.0 Reasonably Responsive Reactivation
FOR
8612& Jason, G., Ørjan 1.0 Tournament Conclusion Fixes v2
FOR
8613* Jason, Trigon 3.0 The Name of the Win Cards v2
FOR
8614* Jason 3.0 Simultaneity Security
FOR
8615* Jason 3.0 Supporter/Objector clarification v2
FOR
8616& nix, Telna, Trigon 1.0 Narrowing Margins
PRESENT - I'm a little concerned about the sentence "If it would be less, the Victory Threshold is instead 1." If it would be less than what?
8617& nix, G. 1.0 Forgiveness
FOR
8618& nix, Jason 1.0 Solo Acitivity
FOR
8619& ATMunn 1.0 The Bottomless Pit
PRESENT - as pointed out by others, the Infinite Nomic round this was intended for has ended. I'm still fine if it passes though; we might be able to use it for something else.
8620& R. Lee 1.0 Im coolxa
AGAINST - I'm not against the idea of winning by proposal, but I don't like the idea that it'll leave a useless rule left over after everyone claims their wins.
8621* R. Lee 3.0 Proposal spreading
ENDORSE Aspen
8622* R. Lee 3.0 [2]
PRESENT
8623& Trigon 1.0 No prizeless victory auctions
FOR
8624& Trigon 1.0 I'd like to thank the academy
FOR, this is a really fun idea
8625& Trigon 1.0 giving the gift of an amendment
AGAINST, as Ørjan pointed out, this proposal is broken.
8626* Trigon, Jason, ais523 3.0 pledge(2)(2)
PRESENT. I really like the idea, but since it's so long, it could have bugs. I don't really have the time or the eye to sort through it.
8627& G. 1.0 INSANITY CLAUSES
FOR
8628& G. 2.0 tacking into the win
FOR
8629* G., Telna, nix, [3] 3.0 Independence Day
FOR
-- ATMunn friendly neighborhood notary :)
