Sherlock wrote:
R2110 (Win by Paradox) limits the number of wins to one person, but
> does not limit the number of wins that individual may achieve for
> noting a paradox. Murphy therefore was eligible to receive any
> number of wins that the Speaker decided to award.
Rule 2110/0 (Power=3)
Win by Paradox
If the legality of an action cannot be determined with finality,
or if by a Judge's best reasoning, not appealed within a week of
eir Judgement, an action appears equally legal and illegal, then
the Speaker shall award the Patent Title of Champion to the
first Player to publicly note that condition. The Herald shall
record that this Title was achieved "by paradox" in eir report.
My interpretation is that "X shall perform action Y" is equivalent to
"X is required and allowed to perform Y exactly once", unless clearly
indicated otherwise.
