On 1/4/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I disagree. Being "mutually exclusive offices" is either a qualifier on offices or a whole (nonseparable) term in and of itself, and does not create an implicit definition Speaker ~ Offices.
That's ridiculous. Standard usage is that "A, B, C are mutually
exclusive X" for {A, B, C} \subset X. Doesn't makes sense otherwise.
--
Taral <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
"You can't prove anything."
-- Gödel's Incompetence Theorem
