On 1/24/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I file a motion for the judge of CFJ 1605 ("Goethe was deregistered in a
Writ of FAGE in December 2006" to consider the following argument:
Murphy claims that certain judgements were "retroactively invalidated"
by Proposal 4882. I strongly dispute this statement. By R217 (power=3)
we are required to judge truth or falsity "at the time the CFJ was
issued." While a proposal may retroactively cause us to treat records
in a certain way, it does not alter what was actually true at that time.
The judge should be cautioned that eir decision in this case will create
a strong precedent governing the ability of proposals to retroactively
alter the truth.
-Goethe
can you file motions as a deregistered player?
