On 2/26/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The Pineapple Partnership hereby calls for judgement on the statement "the Pineapple Partnership is a person". Caller's arguments: the Ruleset does not explicitly define "person", but R754(3) refers to the legal definition. In law a "person" is anything that can be the subject of rights and duties, including corporations and partnerships.
Where is your argument for the claim that the Pineapple Partnership is actually a partnership? This term also has a legal definition. -- Michael Slone
