Kerim Aydin wrote: >In the current ruleset it looks redundant. It's there for whenever >we play "subgames", e.g. have money, land, points and scoring rules,
If a "subgame" automatically involves all players then I reckon that's not very "sub". Subgames in which participation is optional can be dealt with by contracts, of course. As for the specific current use, the sole existing Agoran Contract doesn't look anything like a subgame. Even if Agoran Contracts are to be retained for subgames, I think the Envoy should be governed by an ordinary rule. -zefram
