I've just noticed a clause I hadn't paid much attention to before. As
I understand it, the prevailing argument that an R1742 agreement can
be a person stems from transference of the partnership's obligations
to the comprising members. But consider the first sentence of the
penultimate paragraph of R1742:
If a Civil CFJ is called by anyone who is not party to that
agreement, then it lacks standing and shall be dismissed.
This seems to indicate that a partnership's obligations are only
enforceable to the extent that the partnership's members desire them
to be enforced. Any thoughts?
-root
