On 6/8/07, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
An example of the two tiers: Zefram and root form a partnership,
it registers as a player, and the partnership fails to perform
some required action. Anyone may bring suit against the partnership,
and the partnership as a whole is dinged.
But only Zefram can then allege in court "hey, the partnership
agreement stated that it was root's responsibility to do that for
the partnership, so the punishment should apply to root."
Why would Zefram choose to do this? If there is no benefit for emself
or for the partnership as a whole (e.g. a vacation of the original
sentence), then eir only motivation for propagating the punishment to
the second tier would be eir own sense of honor.
In any case, I raised this as a secondary issue. My original concern
stands: we cannot have legal persons without a legal definition of
person.
-root
