On 6/19/07, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I wrote: >I call for appeal of Eris's judgement of CFJ 1684,Additional argument for appeal: Eris's judgement is inconsistent with the judgement on CFJ 1671, concerning the registration (and so implicitly the personhood) of Second System Effect.
How so? CFJ 1671 appears to have relied on CFJ 1623 for its precedent in this area. -root
