On Friday 23 November 2007 11:31:00 Ed Murphy wrote: > pikhq wrote: > > > [ Any problems with this, rules-wise? Sure hope not. ] > > Afraid so. The contract would need Power >= 2 to alter VC holdings > (Rules 1688 and 2126). > > I tried having the Agoran Credit Union work around this by defining > obligations to do 2-for-1 VC transfers, but it proved sufficiently > difficult that I gave up and just proposed Marks instead. >
Clearly, I should find a scam to shove it in as a proposal. :p
