On Dec 2, 2007 4:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The AFO CFJs on the following: The AFO is a player and a partnership.
> Arguments against: The AFO's contract sates that its members *may* act on
> behalf of the AFO to satisfy its obligations, not that they must. By rule
> 2145, a partnership's members must satisfy its obligations.

You appear to be ignoring paragraph 5:

 > 5. The Partners shall ensure that the AFO obeys the Rules of Agora to
 > the maximum possible extent.

Unless that paragraph has been removed since the AFO was formed.

-root

Reply via email to