On Sunday 02 December 2007 16:06:40 Ian Kelly wrote: > On Dec 2, 2007 4:00 PM, Josiah Worcester <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > The AFO CFJs on the following: The AFO is a player and a partnership. > > Arguments against: The AFO's contract sates that its members *may* act on > > behalf of the AFO to satisfy its obligations, not that they must. By rule > > 2145, a partnership's members must satisfy its obligations. > > You appear to be ignoring paragraph 5: > > > 5. The Partners shall ensure that the AFO obeys the Rules of Agora to > > the maximum possible extent. > > Unless that paragraph has been removed since the AFO was formed. > > -root >
Well, then, the AFO's CFJ should be trivial to judge. Forgot that one.
