On Dec 3, 2007 1:14 PM, Roger Hicks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > B Nomic is not an entity governed by the rules of Agora. Fookiemyartug > on the other hand was created under Agoran law, and within its > contract it submits to it.
It was created under Agoran law, but it is binding upon its members, not upon the game. Agora has never entered into the agreement, and it has never agreed that if it nkeps, it submits. > Also, the adoption of any arbitrary proposal > is considerably different than Agora expressly authorizing the action > (by means of Agoran Consent). Which is where my argument comes in that Agora can't have authorized an action that wasn't clearly specified. We seem to be arguing in circles, so I guess I'll shut up for the time being. I'm interested in hearing what my fellow panelists have to say regarding the appeals of 1799 and 1805 -root
