On Mon, 3 Dec 2007, Ian Kelly wrote: > On Dec 2, 2007 7:51 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Sun, 2 Dec 2007, Ed Murphy wrote: >>> It's been about 4 days and 2.5 hours since my "assuming no response >>> within 4 days" message. I pre-emptively consent to root causing the >>> panel to judge these appeals as e sees fit. >> >> I consent to root causing the panel to judge in a way reasonably >> similar to whatever we discussed 4 days and 2.5 hours ago. -Goethe > > I do not consent. With the nkep scam fully exposed, it now seems > totally ludicrous to me to consider an unknown definition from a > private contract as having meaning in public discourse.
Um, we're talking at cross-purposed I think? I mean I consent to the judgement you already posted a bit earlier (that's what I thought I was consenting to, those several days ago I said if 4 days pass without reasonable evidence, then root is right. And I don't find what was presented to be reasonable with regard to the original). Sorry for the confusion. -Goethe
