On Jan 25, 2008 12:00 PM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ed Murphy wrote: > >CFJ 1659 found that even a contract can't override an explicit rule > >definition, much less a long-standing but still unlegislated custom. > > And as a result we amended the rule that led to that judgement. > Contextual modifications now can override rule definitions.
Yes, but we still require explicit redefinition, don't we? -root
