Zefram wrote:
Ed Murphy wrote:CFJ 1659 found that even a contract can't override an explicit rule definition, much less a long-standing but still unlegislated custom.And as a result we amended the rule that led to that judgement. Contextual modifications now can override rule definitions.
That would be the "by default" clause in 754(2), yes? It's still unclear whether unofficial custom suffices to trigger that, though.
