On Feb 1, 2008 9:17 AM, Zefram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Geoffrey Spear wrote:
> >I initiate a criminal CFJ with Zefram as the defendant, alleging e
> >violated Rule 2149 in the above message by making the statement "I
> >intend to deputise for BobTHJ to deregister em." while not reasonably
> >believing it to be true.
>
> On what grounds do you think I didn't intend it?

On the grounds that BobTHJ isn't a position and there's no reason to
believe you can deputize for an individual player whose obligations
aren't a result of holding a position.

Reply via email to