On Feb 1, 2008 12:31 PM, Ian Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Repealing equity cases would remove the ability to pursue equity in > the broader sense. Equity cases cover general inequities in the > proceedings of contracts, not just the particular cases where some > party has failed to meet eir obligations. Even in those cases, > deputisation can't always correct everything. For example, a party > who fails to vote in the manner e's required to; by the time > deputisation is an option, the voting period will likely have ended.
Well, if I can make a point about trying to use a backdoor method of enforcing contracts when the courts don't give you the result you want and at the same time have a proposal rejected which I'll need to have happen if I'm ever going to get a damn F note, all the better.
