On Feb 4, 2008 1:49 PM, Ed Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Regarding the first instance: A judge who intentionally assigns > an inappropriate judgement should be subject to prosecution. A > judge who assigns a judgement that e believes in good faith is > appropriate, but later turns out to be inappropriate, should (per > CFJ 1863) be either UNAWARE (if eir error is a matter of fact) or > EXCUSED (if it is a matter of interpretation).
I disagree that making inappropriate judgments should be a criminal offense. I'd support having an appeal of a Judge's decision resulting in a judgment of OVERRULE either automatically or perhaps at the option of the Panel revoke either a D note or a Blue ribbon from the overruled Judge, though.
