On Mon, 4 Feb 2008, Ed Murphy wrote: > If the CotC can be corrupt, then why can't the Justiciar? This made > me realize something else, though; proposal coming up.
The point is that you have an alternate path if you know one is corrupt. If both are corrupt, along with the judicial panel...well, at certain numbers corruption just becomes the majority democratic position. Ok, I'll look at your proposal now. -Goethe
