On Tue, 20 May 2008, Ed Murphy wrote:
> ais523 wrote:
>
>> I call for judgement on the following statement: "In the quoted message,
>> ehird
>> sent an infinite number of messages."
>
> Gratuitous counterargument:
>
> X sends a message (actually), so Y sends the same message (legally),
> so X sends the same message... but e already actually does so, so
> there is no need to legally deem that e does so again.
Other gratuitous counterargument:
Since all we do in this game is "send messages", complete confounding of
message=sending between two persons crosses the line found to be impossible
to cross by CFJ 1895, specifically:
"It is a longstanding principle of Agora that fundamental telos, the
Intention, is non-assumable, irreducible, and non-transferable. Every
assumed act of free will can be traced to a particular person's desire.
Thus, as final cause and intention, this intention, and free will is,
also non-transferable, in the most fundamental sense."
-Goethe
