On Wed, 21 May 2008, ihope wrote: > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 3:56 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> No, what we have here is "sending messages as if I were you". That goes >> beyond an action taken "on behalf", where there's no question on who >> the message came from. > > Well, partnerships are certainly capable of doing stuff, and they're > most likely able to do stuff by announcement, which probably means > they can send public messages, if their contract allows people to do > that on their behalf.
You can send messages on someone else's behalf that say "I (someone) hereby send this message on someone else's behalf". That's fine, and it can have some legal effects as if the someone else sent the message. That doesn't mean the someone else actually sent the message, which is important for the infinite loop you're trying to establish. -Goethe
