On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, ais523 wrote: > On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 14:04 -0600, Ian Kelly wrote: > immediately when the voting period ends (and in general, I don't think > it should be illegal to try to vote on something after the end of the > voting period, because that would entail the voter, rather than the > Assessor, having to figure out whether it would be legal; not figuring > it out would probably count as 'reckless' under the current rules).
Well, I don't think that's reckless. I think "reckless" etc. might be as hard to prove as we've made (by precedent) bad judgements hard to pin on the judge. I mean, I've voted on things where I was 99.99% certain that the voting period had ended, but you know, I wasn't *sure*. Basically, do we really want a whole new category of things to CFJ on? Ask yourself that. Ironically, I'm thinking that bringing back crimes of infractions is the surest way to *limit* punishments. *sigh* so much for the experiment, it doesn't even work in our little toy society. -Goethe
