On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, comex wrote: > On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 5:07 PM, Kerim Aydin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Mon, 11 Aug 2008, comex wrote: >>> There is no real way to >>> compel/force anyone to do anything, without their having agreed to a >>> contract to that effect, and there never has been. >> >> Not true. At least, depending on how the R101 case turns out, not >> necessarily >> true. If equity settlements can be imposed in general, we've also found that >> contracts can allow one person to act on behalf of another. An equity case >> can include: >> >> "If Party A fails to act as this equity settlement states, the >> judge can act on Party A's behalf to do so." >> >> I've been planning to use this method for future enforcement, I don't know >> if anyone else has thought of it but it seems pretty straightforward. > > Well, yeah, I discounted that, because I have yet to see a persuasive > argument to the effect that I couldn't just refuse such an equation.
Well, yeah, that's the subject of your CFJ, but there's plenty of opinion at the moment that you can't. -Goethe
