comex wrote:

> On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 9:52 AM, ais523 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I think the Mad Scientist would be required to act on behalf of the
>> Monster to publish on time (publishing a report is something the Monster
>> SHALL do if it's an officeholdor). There isn't an obvious Monsterkeepor,
>> although we have a CFJ on that at the moment; at least, nobody's
>> published an SLM for ages.
> 
> I publish the following SLM:
> {
> There is only one Monster, which is Rule 2193.
> }
> 
> The report is short, logical, and describes the set of Monsters.

Everyone together, now:

      __      _                   ______    ______
     |  \    | |    _       _    |  ___ \  |  ____|
     |   \   | |  _| |_   _| |_  | |   \ \ | |
     | |\ \  | | |_   _| |_   _| | |___/ / | |__
     | | \ \ | |   | |     | |   |  ____/  |  __|
     | |  \ \| |   | |     | |   | |       | |
     | |   \   |   | |     | |   | |       | |
     |_|    \__|   |_|     |_|   |_|       |_|

Reply via email to