On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, comex wrote: > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> 6059 D 1 2.0 comex "Voluntary" creation of rests >>> FOR >> >> I've found the scam here I believe; I'm not going to describe it >> while this is being voted for in case comex hasn't thought of it :), >> but I strongly recommend Against here. -Goethe > > It's not a scam (ttPF!). Nor do I think ais523's pronoun argument is > very convincing-- the referent is clear. I suppose it'll fail now-- > good for me now that I realize the Vote Market might force me to > create large amounts of Rests.
Er, scam aside, did I miss the legitimate context under which anyone *would* create Rests in eir own possession? I might not have looked so hard for a scam if I'd know there was an intended reason. -Goethe
