On Tue, 2009-01-20 at 14:08 -0800, Kerim Aydin wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Jan 2009, comex wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>> 6059 D 1 2.0 comex "Voluntary" creation of rests
> >>> FOR
> >>
> >> I've found the scam here I believe; I'm not going to describe it
> >> while this is being voted for in case comex hasn't thought of it :),
> >> but I strongly recommend Against here. -Goethe
> >
> > It's not a scam (ttPF!). Nor do I think ais523's pronoun argument is
> > very convincing-- the referent is clear. I suppose it'll fail now--
> > good for me now that I realize the Vote Market might force me to
> > create large amounts of Rests.
>
> Er, scam aside, did I miss the legitimate context under which anyone
> *would* create Rests in eir own possession? I might not have looked
> so hard for a scam if I'd know there was an intended reason. -Goethe
>
Because they were forced to by a contract. The intent of the contract,
AFAICT, was to allow contracts to specify punishments in Rests which
would apply to people breaking them (i.e. wording like "Do this, or
anyone CAN act on your behalf to cause you to create rests").
--
ais523
