On Tue, 27 Jan 2009, Warrigal wrote: > On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:14 PM, Kerim Aydin <[email protected]> wrote: >> Having such an explanation laid out and discussed was the purpose of this >> CFJ, but you can't (or at least shouldn't) dismiss it quite so simply. > > Sorry, I was under the impression that I was agreeing with you when I said > that. > > I have nothing more to say right now.
Oh... my bad, I see what you were saying now. Sorry. -G.
